08 October 2015

Australia: Left vs Right

Some context. Liberals in Australia are considered conservative (seeing as liberal and libertarian are the same thing). In America the Left hijacked the term - as they always do - to hide their true ideology, which is everything not libertarian....

Russia launches cruise missiles into Syria

After 5 days of pounding Obama's "moderate" Syrian rebels, ISIS and the other rag-head murderers in Syria, with over 100 airstrikes , Russia has now launched a volley of complex cruise missile strikes against the filthy rag-heads - from 4 ships nearly 1,000 miles away, in the Caspian Sea:

The above picture doesn't indicate the exact path of the missiles, but just shows you the distance the missiles have traveled into Syria. The missiles 'engaged all the assigned targets successfully and with high accuracy' according to Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu.

Syrian ground troops are now moving in under the cover of Putin's airstrikes.

There are also reports that the Russian special forces Spetsnaz units are preparing ground assaults to 'wipe out' rebels fighting the Syrian President. By 'wipe out', let's hope they mean totally annihilate and destroy them. Spetsnaz are highly trained and extremely aggressive. You don't mess with them. 

I'm sorry to say it, but this has been an awesome display from Russia so far. Their military might has been building up over the years, led by Putin, and while Russia was strengthening their military, Obama was dismantling the US military just as quickly, replacing all the competent generals with his fabulous social justice warriors.

Russia has been planning this exercise for months. They have been completing military drills, together with China, in preparation for this onslaught. This wasn't an overnight decision with no preparation. They would have known exactly which targets to hit, and where Obama's proxy army was hiding. 

First you pound their hideouts from the air, then you bomb their strongholds in the cities they have captured, then you move in on the ground - and you show no mercy. Then you watch as the cockroaches scurry away, then you step on them with a huge boot.  The Jihadi's wouldn't know what hit them. Already 450 have surrendered. Let's hope they are shown the same mercy they showed the Yazidi's women and girls, which would be none.

In last Friday’s press conference, Obama said that Putin was acting “not out of strength but out of weakness".

If this is what Russia's weakness looks like, then bring it on.

In contrast, when Obama acts out of weakness, he's merely playing to his strength.

Just about the entire world is behind Putin on this one - except the NATO gang. And it's about time. Russia is proving the old adage - don't talk, do.

Those who can't do, talk. Hi Obama.

And of course, the Lefty media keep reporting about all the civilian deaths at the hands of the Russians. Yeah, I don't give a rat's behind. There has been thousands of civilians deaths in Syria and Iraq since the Arab Spring and the ISIS invasion  (never mind the Iraq war), and very rarely were the media too concerned. Now all of a sudden, since Putin decided to clean up this mess, now they're concerned at the deaths? 

Maybe they should read the comments under their 'oh look how evil Putin is' articles. I have yet to see ONE comment not supporting his actions. You, dear media, are on the wrong side of history. Piss off.

And go cry me a river. 

Germany: We will manage - Merkel

Repeating the mantra “Wir schaffen das,” (“We will manage,”) German Chancellor Angela Merkel is defending her strategy on handling the refugee crisis against growing criticism.

What is her thinking, you ask? Well, her thinking is as follows:

“Let’s just assume we all would declare that we will not manage it — then what?” she asked host Anne Will in a prime-time, adding: “Those people who are helping are an example for the many people willing to manage this situation together with me.”

If brains were dynamite, Merkel wouldn't blow her ears off.  

So, her plan is to will it all to be okay with positive thinking in response to letting 1.5 million Muslim and African 'refugees' into Germany this year?? That's like jumping out of a plane with feathers attached and willing yourself to fly. Does that work, Merkel? Hint: no. The odds would be against you.

Asked what she will do, now that she is losing the support of her political allies?

“I have a plan,” she said 

So, Frau Merkel, what is that plan?

"The first thing I need to achieve is that Europe lives up to its responsibility, and not just four countries".

So, there you have it, she is passing the monkey she alone bought, and placing it on the backs of all the other countries who didn't have a say in buying the monkey.


And just to cement her reputation as the most idiotic current European leader, in a party meeting yesterday, Merkel was especially tough on European countries that have portrayed the acceptance of refugees as a threat to religion. “When someone says: ‘This is not my Europe, I won’t accept Muslims….’ Then I have to say, this is not negotiable.”

This woman is not only a danger to Germany, she is a danger to the Western world.

Germany, under this lunatic, is once again going to destroy Europe.

No wonder the polls have shown her support drop from 60 to 47.

Still too high if you ask me. A few more weeks and she'll be in the negative.

06 October 2015

Meanwhile in Holland.....

Check out these grateful 'refugees' who are on their knees kissing Dutch soil in gratitude.

Only kidding. 

No, complaints from these ungrateful invaders range from the rooms at the shelter being too small with no privacy, there are no heaters or fridges in their rooms, it's smelly, it's too cold.....

Many are threatening to leave, and the officials have said cheers, see ya later.

I must say, for 'refugees' they sure look pretty healthy. The main female speaker has blue hair and bright pink nails which look very well manicured. Yeah, she sure looks like she fled for her life.

The English language

Germany expects 1.5 million asylum seekers this year, report says

So, about those 800,000 economic migrants from Africa and the Middle East set to invade Germany this year.... yeah, scrap that. The number is now 1.5 million.

That's according to a confidential document containing estimates that are far higher than the officially released figures.

Gee, you would think the German government were covering up something unsavory.....

Germany is expecting 7,000-10,000 immigrants PER DAY until the end of the year. Who knows what happens next year. 

But, the good news doesn't stop there. No sirree Otto. Each asylum-seeker who successfully obtains refugee status can bring on average "four to eight" family members to Germany:
On the basis of the preliminary forecast of 920,000 migrants, some "7.36 million people" could therefore have the right to move to Germany due to family ties. 
Imagine that. Another 8 million Muslims/Africans added to your population overnight. Then watch as they start breeding like rabbits in the next few years. That 8 million will double no problem. Especially seeing as Germoney pays for people to have children. Then pays you not to work. Paradise!

According to the article below, "Chancellor Angela Merkel has been lauded worldwide for her decision to open Germany's doors to refugees fleeing war and misery." Haha. Yeah, sure they are lauding her. Or maybe they're laughing so hard at her stupidity and what's she's doing to a future Germany. 

Back in Germany, Merkel's popularity is on the slippery slide downwards. It appears reality is starting to bite those who were in the pro 'refugee' camp. Yes, those idiots begged, please invade our country, change it from Christian to Muslim, bring in your conflicts, your liars, your rapers, your misogynists, your low-intelligent-low-skilled unwanted masses, bring in your breeding cows, and come make Germany better! 

Said no one ever, apart from the dumb self-hating Lefties.

BERLIN: Germany could receive up to 1.5 million asylum-seekers this year, according to the newspaper Bild, quoting a confidential document containing estimates that are far higher than publicly released official figures. 

Authorities have so far predicted that Europe's top economy would record between 800,000 and one million new arrivals in 2015. 

But Bild quoted the document saying that the authorities were now expecting to receive 920,000 new arrivals in the coming three months alone, bringing the total number of asylum-seekers this year to 1.5 million. 

"The migratory pressure will increase. For the fourth quarter, we expect between 7,000 and 10,000 illegal entries a day," according to extracts of the document, although Bild did not specify its source. 

"The significant number of asylum-seekers risks becoming an extreme burden for the regions and communes," added the document. 

The newspaper also quoted the document estimating that each asylum-seeker who successfully obtained refugee status could bring on average "four to eight" family members to Germany. 

On the basis of the preliminary forecast of 920,000 migrants, some "7.36 million people" could therefore have the right to move to Germany due to family ties. 

Interior ministry spokesman Harald Neymanns would not confirm the figures, noting however that the onset of winter could slow the surge in arrivals - as shown in previous years. 

"We are still expecting the migration pressure to drop in the winter months," he said. 

Government spokesman Georg Streiter said he was not aware of the document's existence. 

Chancellor Angela Merkel has been lauded worldwide for her decision to open Germany's doors to refugees fleeing war and misery. 

But within Germany, her popularity is starting to wane as local authorities struggle to cope with the massive task of hosting the record surge in refugees. 

Sweden: Lesbian "Bishop" wants to remove church cross for Islam

This post is just to show you how farked up Sweden is becoming under the Progressive filth running the country. Actually, apply that to any country Progressives occupy. They are mentally ill.

A  Church of Sweden lesbian Bishop, Eva Brunne, is proposing removing all signs of the cross from a church in her diocese, and rather marking the direction of Mecca for the benefit of any Muslim worshipers who may happen to stumble onto the church. 

Because, one wouldn't want to offend Muslims or stop them from visiting a church, because, god forbid, there are Christian symbols in a Christian church....

I wonder if lesbian Bishop Brunne is aware of what Muslims do to homosexuals?

That's what's wrong with the world. A lesbian - made a Bishop of a Christian church. A woman who can't preach about the traditional family, espouse the values, and/or promote true Christianity. Bishop Eva was the first token first openly lesbian priest to be made a Bishop of the Church of Sweden and is 'married' to a fellow lesbian priest Gunilla Linden and the happy wives are raising a young son. There is so much wrong with this entire scenario - where does one even begin?

God help the child, is all I know.

Actually, I'm pretty surprised Sweden has any churches or Christians left. I guess this woman is an example of what the new social justice "Christian" churches, springing up all around the world, promotes. Anything that was once shunned is now considered 'normal' and is to be embraced, encouraged and defended at the expense of the traditional family and Christian values. Just imagine sitting through one of her sermons. You'd leave feeling dirty.

These days the church is no longer a meeting place of worship, but rather a political platform used by the Left to brainwash people and make them feel guilty, because they're not tolerant enough, or not doing enough to help their fellow 3rd world'ers. Go to 'church' and get preached to on how you need to accept non-Christian values, sacrifice your society to be inclusive and diverse, and give your hard-earned money to others who are too lazy to help themselves. 

After all, the West was built into a success by diverse people sitting around all day moaning about what they don't have and envying and coveting what others have achieved.

In the past, missionaries used to go out into the world to preach about goodness, and try and better the lives of the non-believers. Most were murdered, so that had to stop. Nowadays, church leaders would rather just bash their followers over the head in church. It's much easier than actually doing, and makes them feel good at the same time.

In this case, the church targeted by this lesbian woman is the Seamen’s mission church in Stockholm’s eastern dockyards. The church is visited by travelling seamen. 

What is her reasoning behind removing the cross, you ask? From her blog:
"It is important that there are places for praying sisters and brothers and we show hospitality and tolerance, regardless of faith."
I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm pretty sure no mosque would remove traces of Islam for the odd Christian who happened to go inside? Just a wild guess. 

What's next? Muslim prayer-rooms and Buddhist altars in consecrated Christian churches? Err.... yes, most definitely. It's only a matter of time. The West is being Progressed down the toilet after all.

Then she keeps going:
"Priests are called to proclaim Christ. We do that every day and in every meeting with people. But that does not mean that we are stingy toward people of other faiths."
This is what 'tolerance' brings the world. A messed up society trying to please everyone, so as not to offend anyone, or be regarded as stingy. Being all things to everyone never works out very well for the appeaser. 

Sometimes, dear lesbian Bishop, you have to draw a line in the sand and stick up for your principles and protect the heritage you were fortunate enough to inherit from previous generations. But when you don't have principles, then this is the end result. Appeasement.

Her final words of wisdom:
Remember to entertain strangers, for it has happened that those who have done it have had angels without knowing it.  (Hebrews 13: 2)
Thanks, but I would prefer not to entertain strangers. Same as I would prefer not to pick up hitch-hikers. It often doesn't end well.

But, seeing as the good Bishop is big on quoting the Bible, maybe she needs to read this passage:
Exodus 23:24 Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images.
Maybe the Bible was translated incorrectly into Swedish? That would sure explain a lot of what's gone wrong with Sweden.

Once you start trashing church traditions, pretty soon you have to make it up as you go along, until suddenly there’s nothing left of what you inherited or stood for. 

Next thing Bishop Lesbian Brunne knows is that there's a mosque where once a Church of Sweden stood. That should make her real happy.

The appeaser Bishop Eva Brunne

The Bishop of Stockholm has proposed a church in her diocese remove all signs of the cross and put down markings showing the direction to Mecca for the benefit of Muslim worshippers.

Eva Brunne, who was made the world’s first openly lesbian bishop by the church of Sweden in 2009, and has a young son with her wife and fellow lesbian priest Gunilla Linden, made the suggestion to make those of other faiths more welcome.

The church targeted is the Seamen’s mission church in Stockholm’s eastern dockyards. The Bishop held a meeting there this year and challenged the priest to explain what he’d do if a ship’s crew came into port who weren’t Christian but wanted to pray.

Calling Muslim guests to the church “angels“, the Bishop later took to her official blog to explain that removing Christian symbols from the church and preparing the building for Muslim prayer doesn’t make a priest any less a defender of the faith. Rather, to do any less would make one “stingy towards people of other faiths”.

The bishop insisted this wasn’t an issue, after all airports and hospitals already had multi-faith prayer rooms, and converting the dockyard church would only bring it up to speed. Regardless, the announcement has aroused protest.

Father Patrik Pettersson, one of the priests in her diocese and active in the same parish as the Seaman’s mission church has hit back in a blog of his own, complaining there is no way you could equate a consecrated church with a prayer room, remarking “I should have thought a bishop would be able to tell the difference”.

02 October 2015

This is my understanding of the Syrian situation

This is my assessment of the Syrian situation:

Obama's administration and the neo-cons in Congress want President Bashar al-Assad of Syria gone. Dead or alive, he needs to go. The exact reason is unknown, but what is known is that Saudi Arabia and Qatar - both allies of the USA - are enemies of Assad. 

Assad is a Shia Muslim, the Saudi's and Qataris are Sunni Muslim. This is the reason for the centuries-old conflict in the region, and importing this conflict into our Western countries via Muslim "refugees" will not end well for us.

The Saudi's go one step further in that the Sunni's are Salafi and/or Wahhabi Sunni's - ultra conservative orthodox Muslims, who tend to interpret the Koran extremely literally. Hence why people have their heads chopped off in the street if you insult Mo. This is also the reason they use their oil money to litter the world with Wahhabi mosques and Islamic-only schools, i.e. madrasa, in Western countries - to force Islam onto kaffir non-believers. It's why Saudi Arabia very generously offered to build one new mosque in Germany for every 100 Muslims Germany takes in as 'refugees', without offering to take in any refugees themselves. Just like all the other rich gulf states, Qatar included, who have also not offered to take in any Muslim "refugees". 

The stupid West gets that honour. Nothing like enriching a country with imported tribal conflicts. Hi Germany!

Apart from the obvious tribal conflicts between the different Islamic sects in the Middle East, there are also underlying geo-political power-plays driving the conflict in the region. 

Syria stands in the way of any direct gas/oil pipeline into Europe, which Qatar wants to build. If they have their proxy ISIS running Syria, problem solved.

So, on the one side you have the Shia-run countries (supported by Russia):
  • Syria
  • Iran
  • Lebanon (Hezbollah)
  • Iraq
On the other you have the Sunni-run countries (supported by the USA/Britain):
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Qatar
  • Turkey
Iraq is a mix of the two sects, but Shia is the slight majority (~ 51% Shia and ~42% Sunni). The government is mainly Shia. Hence why Iran is their current buddy.

So, back to Syria. 

The USA, for unknown reasons, decided to stick its nose in the region shortly after Barry from Honolulu was elected POTUS. This was all done by encouraging the Arab Spring. This off the back of Barry removing US troops from Iraq without leaving a presence behind to maintain the fragile and hard-won peace. 

How many (White) American troops died fighting that war, all for it to mean nothing in the end??? Same with Afghanistan.

The Arab Spring was no 'spontaneous grass-roots movement' as certain people and the media would have you believe. It was a carefully orchestrated attack on certain strategic Islamic regimes in the ME. 

As part of the Arab Spring, America threw their former friendly-dictators under the bus, one by one. Out with the old, in with the new.

The catalyst for the Arab Spring was in Tunisia, where a man set himself alight to protest the poor economic state in the country. That was the spark used to justify the Arab Spring spreading to other countries.

First Mubarak was thrown under the bus and Egypt fell to the Muslim Brotherhood; however, order was quickly restored - luckily - with the military taking over and ousting the MB. The Brotherhood - backed by Obama - is Sunni. Obama's half-brother is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood...

Libya was then targeted and Ghadaffi removed with the blessing of Hilary Clinton. Just under a year later, US Ambassador Stevens was murdered in Benghazi along with 3 other Americans. Reason for his murder is unknown, but it is widely believed it was because America was funneling Ghadaffi's stockpile of weapons to the Syrian 'rebels' via Libya - overseen by Stevens, and planned by Hilary/Bill Clinton and the Obama administration. Bill Clinton is in bed with the Qataris through his "foundation". He has received millions in donations from them and used his wife to further Qatar's agenda. I would guess it's why Madam Clinton used a private email account while Secretary of State.

Today Libya burns with tribal wars and ISIS infiltrating. The country now acts as the gateway for Africans and other economic migrants to climb on board boats headed for gullible Europe. Ghadaffi warned this exact thing would happen should he be removed. 

In the meantime, the Arab Spring was 'spontaneously' moving from one ME country to another. It spluttered in Yemen, but gained traction in Syria. Syria was the ultimate prize of course. 

The US military armed and trained "good rebels" in Syria to depose Assad. And just as the world was looking incredulously at America for wanting to start another ME conflict, the US government miraculously found evidence that Assad had used chemical weapons against his own people - thereby justifying them bombing Syria. Barry had just by pure accident a few weeks earlier, drawn a red-line outlining at what point he'd bomb Syria to help the rebels and save Syria, and that red-line was if Assad used chemicals weapons. 

And bingo, don't you just know it - Assad was found to have done just that by Obama's 'rebels'. Gee, what are the chances, right? And there are still idiots in the world who think Assad wasn't set up. 

Luckily Russia stepped in before America started bombing and defused the situation by convincing Assad to hand over any chemical weapons he may have. That was a pretty genius move by Russia, as it nullified the US from using that paltry excuse to bomb Syria down the line; and, it made the world see that Assad was willing to do the right thing.

Russia started looking like a world-leader (hence why they had to attack Putin via Ukraine and sanctions).

Back in Iraq, the ousted army generals and soldiers who served under Suddam Hussein, had united to form ISIS in east Syria, on the border with Iraq. Once America removed the troops from Iraq, that was the signal for ISIS to move into Iraq and start their campaign of creating the Islamic caliphate via their war of terror and death. That was the excuse given, but the real reason was to depose the Shia government in Baghdad and return government to the Sunni's. Saudi Arabia and Qatar would be happy again.

Most of the Syrian "rebels" who had been armed and trained by the US to depose Assad, joined ISIS instead, eagerly handing over their band-new American-gifted weapons and other supplies to ISIS, and the rest is pretty much history.

In Syria today you have the US-backed 'rebel' fighters fighting side-by-side with ISIS to get rid of Assad. They are practically one and the same thing.

And that is the reason Russia bombed the hell out of the 'rebels' 2 days ago when they launched their air offensive in Syria. 

Both the rebels and ISIS are enemies of Assad. Assad is Russia's ally.

I find it pretty funny how the American analysts now attack Russia for targeting the US-backed 'rebel' fighters. HELLO! Earth to reality.

Saudi Arabia was also quick to condemn the Russian bombings. Apparently innocent women and children were killed. This all said with a straight face. First, dear Saudi Arabia, you execute women and children in your country every year - usually on the flimsiest excuse - without batting an eyelid. Secondly, have you forgotten that Saudi Arabia has been bombing Yemen for months now, killing thousands of innocent women and children in the process???

The hypocrisy is astounding.

Russia has stepped in because they have 2 military bases in Syria to support their Black Sea naval fleet - plus, Assad is their ally. Unlike America, Russia is loyal to their allies. Having Assad in control of Syria also secures them against Qatar threatening their gas lines into Europe.

Iran needs Assad to remain where he is, otherwise Hezbollah in Lebanon will be cut off from Iran and Turkey will have more clout in the region. Iran also needs to secure Iraq against Saudi Arabia getting their grubby paws on the country via ISIS.

The only issue I don't quite understand in this entire drama, is why America, under John Kerry, decided to work with Iran regarding the nuclear issue. That part is still a bit hazy to me.The only reason would be to threaten Israel via Iran - but then why go to the trouble of destabilising Syria and Iraq to return them to Sunni control if you then work with Iran and strengthen a Shia nation? Maybe one of my readers can help me out with that one.

And there you have my brief analysis. Let me know if you disagree.

30 September 2015

Guess where in the world.....

Let's play a game of 'guess where in the world'.

Was this video shot in:
  • Africa
  • The Middle East
  • Austria/Hungary